Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives was admitted by its own author to be one of the most cited but least read texts in education. It boils down to such a concise, self-explanatory graphic that few teachers return to the original book. While it is often oversimplified, it remains a key theory in the Learning Developer’s repertoire because of its direct impact on how students perceive their own progress.
🤔 What is Bloom's Taxonomy?
Developed in the 1950s, this framework clarifies learning outcomes to ensure university study is suitably challenging. While it covers three dimensions—cognitive, affective, and psychomotor—the cognitive dimension is the most widely applied.
The 2001 revision famously swapped the top two levels, placing "Creating" (Synthesis) as the ultimate cognitive challenge above "Evaluating."
- Knowledge (Remembering): Recalling facts and information.
- Understanding: Making sense of information and explaining its meaning.
- Application: Using theory to guide practice or applying knowledge to new contexts.
- Analysis: Breaking knowledge down into constituent parts to see how they relate.
- Evaluation: Making value judgements based on criteria (good/bad, relevant/not).
- Synthesis (Creating): Bringing disparate bits of knowledge together to create a new whole.
Why it Matters to Learning Development
Universities use the language of Bloom in marking criteria and feedback, yet it is rarely transparent to students. The Learning Developer navigates three specific hurdles:
1. Lack of Transparency
2. Vague Terminology
3. Avoiding Rigid Application
🏫 Teaching Bloom to Students
Why hide the model that guides our practice? Using Bloom as a heuristic (an interpretive framework) empowers students to take control of their learning.
- Managing Expectations: Define what "advanced" actually means at each level of transition.
- Unpacking Assignments: Identify if "discuss" means a simple talk or a high-order analysis.
- Interpreting Feedback: If feedback says "too descriptive," it means the student stopped at Knowledge/Understanding. We guide them to do something with that knowledge.
- The Editing Tool: Help students check the balance of their writing. "Don't find an answer—make one."
Alternative: For a simpler approach, use the ICE model: Ideas → Connections → Extensions.
The Toolkit: Verbs for Learning Outcomes
Choosing the right verb is essential for aligning teaching with assessment.
| Level | Definition | Active Verbs |
|---|---|---|
| Remember | Retrieve knowledge from long-term memory. | Cite, Define, Identify, Label, List, Match, Quote, Recall, State, Tabulate. |
| Understand | Demonstrate comprehension via explanation. | Categorize, Classify, Compare, Contrast, Differentiate, Explain, Illustrate, Summarize. |
| Apply | Use information or skill in a new situation. | Calculate, Demonstrate, Employ, Examine, Implement, Modify, Solve, Use. |
| Analyze | Break material into parts and find relationships. | Deconstruct, Diagram, Discriminate, Integrate, Inventory, Relate, Structure. |
| Evaluate | Make judgments based on criteria and standards. | Appraise, Argue, Assess, Critique, Justify, Measure, Recommend, Validate. |
| Create | Put elements together to form a functional whole. |
The Peak: Create
Definition: Put elements together to form a new coherent or functional whole; reorganize elements into a new pattern or structure.
Verbs: Assemble, Build, Combine, Compose, Constitute, Construct, Design, Develop, Devise, Formulate, Generate, Hypothesize, Invent, Manage, Organize, Produce, Propose, Reconstruct, Rewrite, Synthesize.
Conclusion
Bloom’s taxonomy is a "nudge" to ensure we are challenging students appropriately. It reminds us to move beyond "telling" and instead encourage students to evaluate strategies and synthesize their own approaches. It is an essential tool for emancipatory, student-centered practice. By ignoring the "easy route" of simple knowledge transfer, we help students master the affective and psychomotor domains alongside the cognitive.